pearl wrote:
>>>>>>>I'd think
>>>>>>
>>>>>>if you only had a brain.
>>>>>
>>>>>You're saying I don't have a brain? Interesting..
>>>>
>>>>People with brains tend not to support the following notions:
>>>
>>>People with functional brains don't repeatedly claim that somebody
>>>believes something which the list compiler has admitted is partly false.
>>
>>There was NO admission that any part of the list is false, in part or in
>>whole.
>
> You claim I believe/support/whatever your fraudulent list. I don't.

That leaves *ONE* issue up in the air, namely her views on the
Holocaust. If that one item is completely wrong, the list is
still 96.154% correct. I will *gladly* remove that one from the
list if the goofy little ditz insists to make sure it's 100%
correct.
http://tinyurl.com/5zv56

>>>usual suspect:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>The only issue you really complained about
>>>>>>>
>>>pearl:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>"really", as opposed to?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As opposed to nitpicking or suggesting that you stood by something
>>>>>
>>>>>As opposed to disagreeing with it.
>>>>
>>>>You disagreed that it was put together as an indictment of your unsound
>>>>judgment and even more unsound state of mind. You agreed with nearly
>>>>every point as reflecting your opinions on those issues.
>>
>>That speaks to your agreeement on most of the points (92%).
>
> Link to this 'agreement'?

You can dig through the archives for your first response. You agreed
with nearly every point, even posting links to pics that "prove" inner
earth beings live beneath Mt Shasta. The only points over which you
expressed any disagreement were the ones dealing with your ex-husband
and the thing about Holocaust denial. The latter was immediately removed
from my version of the list. The former parts about your marriage to a
violent skinhead will remain because those are undeniable: you fell in
love with a violent skinhead, shagged him, married him, and so on. It's
time you stop blaming others for your accumulated "baggage."

>>That *you*
>>disagree with some of those points, despite the evidence offered
>>throughout those threads, is your own issue to deal with.
>
> You have no evidence on most points, just twisted assumptions.

Plenty of evidence. See the link above.