In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Scented Nectar" > wrote
>
> >> The argument is plain, and you can't even begin to
> >> rebut it.
> >>
> >> The conclusion is clear: you don't believe at all that
> >> it is wrong to kill animals.
> >
> > <rebut> If I don't believe that it's wrong to kill
> > animals then why do I feel good about lessening
> > their deaths? Huh? </rebut>
>
> If you really thought it was "wrong" you would find a way to do much more
> than you are doing.

Thank you for repeating yourself...

If you really thought it was wrong, you would find a way to do much more
about sexually broomed children.

If your really thought it was wrong, you would find a way tod o much
more about the death of humans

If you really thought it was wrong....

Not that I've completely embarrased you, what next.



> The shocking thing is that you don't even think it's *bad*. Even if
> consuming meat would prevent some animal death you wouldn't do it, because
> of the TASTE!
>
> Eating more vegetables is good, eating all vegetables is fine. Assigning
> false moral significance to it is a mistake.