"Scented Nectar" > wrote

>> The argument is plain, and you can't even begin to
>> rebut it.
>>
>> The conclusion is clear: you don't believe at all that
>> it is wrong to kill animals.
>
> <rebut> If I don't believe that it's wrong to kill
> animals then why do I feel good about lessening
> their deaths? Huh? </rebut>

If you really thought it was "wrong" you would find a way to do much more
than you are doing.

The shocking thing is that you don't even think it's *bad*. Even if
consuming meat would prevent some animal death you wouldn't do it, because
of the TASTE!

Eating more vegetables is good, eating all vegetables is fine. Assigning
false moral significance to it is a mistake.