On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:29:28 -0500, "Scented Nectar" > wrote:
>"Reynard" > wrote in message ...
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:27:04 GMT, "rick etter" > wrote:
>> >"Reynard" > wrote in message ...
>> >> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:18:44 GMT, "rick etter" >wrote:
>> >>>"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ...
>> >>>>> > SN
>> >>>>> > http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
>> >>>>> > A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
>> >>>>> > Has a fun 'Jump to a Randon Link' button.
>> >>>>> > Irony, ignorance and hypocrisy on display.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see you're back to adding a third description
>> >>>> line to my sig. Complete with the extra ' >' to
>> >>>> make it look like I wrote it. What a liar.
>> >>>> =======================
>> >>>Look at the beginning of the line above fool. I did NOT
>> >>>add the '>'.
>> >>
>> >> You're lying, Rick, as your comment in another thread
>> >> to this proves;
>> >====================
>> >Nope.
>
>He's trying to get away with it based on the fact that a
>' >' was already there. What he's hoping to avoid saying
>is that he placed the 3rd line beside it on purpose to
>make it look like I wrote it.

I can see exactly what he's up to, and it's of no surprise to
me at all. Apart from all the bare-faced lying he continually
relies on, he's never slow to follow the other trolls here and
edit his opponent's posts.

>> Yep. Read on. You admitted to the fact that you added a
>> third line to her sig, and then went on to blame her for it
>> by writing, "What's the matter fool? Don't like the same
>> as you give?"
>
>I've never falsified his posts, so he lies again.

Exactly! As soon as you catch them at it, they're very quick
to accuse their victims of doing the same thing in the hope
they'll be excused.

>He tries
>to justify it by saying it was because I snipped stuff of
>his in posts. Not the same thing at all.

I agree. Snipping the parts of a post which don't merit a
response is perfectly legitimate, but these trolls go one
step further and edit words INTO their opponent's posts
before then replying to them, and that isn't legitimate at
all.

>> >>>[start - Scented Nectar to you]
>> >>> Note below the extra '>' you always put in to make it look
>> >>> like I wrote it. What's that about, liar?
>> >> ==================
>> >> What's the matter fool? Don't like the same as you give?
>> >> [end]
>> >>
>> >> You've admitted you added a third line to her sig, and now
>> >> it seems you're trying to blame Scented Nectar for what
>> >> you did. Not only is it wrong to edit people's sigs, as you've
>> >> done, it's also wrong to blame the person whose lines you've
>> >> altered as well.
>> >>
>> >> A note to Scented Nectar; You'll find most if not all the trolls
>> >> here will alter your posts in some way after a while. Apart
>> >> from the earlier example I gave you from 'usual suspect', take
>> >> a look at how Dutch changed my reply to a challenge he made
>> >> directly to me while I was posting under the name 'ipse dixit'.
>> >> He challenged me to post a typical weekly grocery list to which
>> >> I replied, "Fallen apples and mustard cress." He removed my
>> >> reply and wrote a number of non-vegan foods in its stead, and
>> >> then went on to blame me for editing it, just as Rick is trying to
>> >> blame you for his editing of your posts.
>
>Yep. It makes their 'side' of the debates look dishonest and
>discredits any other points they try to make. Same with the
>constant insults.

You'll find that all the trolls here substitute debate for insults.
Rick is probably the worst, but the others aren't that far
behind him.

>> >> [start - Dutch to me]
>> >>> > > > > > > > I challenge you to post your typical weekly grocery
>> >>> > > > > > > > list here.
>> >>
>> >> I replied, "Fallen apples and mustard cress" at this point, but
>> >> Dutch snipped that away and wrote (below);
>> >>
>> >>> > > > > > > Factory farmed rice, grains, fruits and vegetables
>> >>> > > > > > > purchased indiscriminately, coffee, tea, cheese,
>> >>> > > > > > > milk and eggs, along with some shit that I have no
>> >>> > > > > > > clue about.
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > You have dishonestly included a list of items I don't eat
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > You lied about what you eat.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > You have no way of knowing that,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I know your grocery list is not comprised of fallen apples
>> >>> > and mustard cress.
>> >>>
>> >>> Whether you believe my answer or not is no excuse for
>> >>> dishonestly editing it to include a of list non-vegan food.
>> >> [end] http://tinyurl.com/3tde3
>> >>
>> >> You have to be extra vigilant here where Rick, Dutch, usual
>> >> suspect and Jonathan Ball are concerned, else your sentences
>> >> will be altered without you even knowing about it.
>
>I saw him doing it right from the start but just rolled my eyes.
>Then it sunk in more that he was trying to make it look like
>I wrote it, so it was time to make him fess up. He's
>avoiding it (not well).

He won't fess up. You can rely on that.