Bob (this one) wrote:
> Bob wrote:
>
>> Bob Pastorio egged Peter on:
>>
>>> Peter, you have an uncanny knack for picking irrelevant criteria for
>>> your
>>> decisions. The whole point of this reduction, you say it to drive out
>>> the
>>> excess water while retaining the other desirable elements. Why don't you
>>> just freeze it. Water will freeze first. Other stuff remains liquid.
>>> Maybe. Another science project. No heat involved.
>>
>>
>> Oh, c'mon, Bob! You know perfectly well that a better way to remove the
>> water would be to freeze the liquid in a vacuum chamber. And I'm sure
>> that
>> Peter would be willing to acquire an apparatus which would allow him
>> to do just that.
>
>
> I bet he'd appreciate some URL's that would offer him such equipment.
> Have your people get right on that, ok?
>
> There is already available a full range of commercial products from
> vinegar concentrates (very syrupy) to spray-dried vinegar powder. This
> latest exercise from Peter is reinventing the wheel to drive to the
> beginning of reinventing yet another wheel.
>
> I mean home science projects are all well and good. I do my share of
> them and I suspect you do as well. But I do ask a few questions first
> and adjust my thinking based on facts obtained.
>
> Oh, well..Tis the season to be jolly and all.
>
> Pastorio
>
i am not trying to invent the wheeel--i am fully cognisant of vacumne
distallation ( searched on ebay for a set up)--to much money

freeze drying same problem

but dialysis tubing yep got it but has to be boiuled in chelating
solution to remove havy metals--not a good way

collegen saussage casing AHHHA this might be the way!!
stay tuned