Bob wrote:
> Bob Pastorio egged Peter on:
>
>
>>Peter, you have an uncanny knack for picking irrelevant criteria for your
>>decisions. The whole point of this reduction, you say it to drive out the
>>excess water while retaining the other desirable elements. Why don't you
>>just freeze it. Water will freeze first. Other stuff remains liquid.
>>Maybe. Another science project. No heat involved.
>
>
> Oh, c'mon, Bob! You know perfectly well that a better way to remove the
> water would be to freeze the liquid in a vacuum chamber. And I'm sure that
> Peter would be willing to acquire an apparatus which would allow him to do
> just that.
>
> Bob
>
>
i agree ideal weay would be to freeze dry it--once did it took a gallon
of wine and got it down to about 2 ml--used it to seperate out the
sugars using column chromatography

lab looked like a rainbow of tubes
beautiful!!!