Could Trevor just have answered to question? Of course he could.

That's not an unreasonble expection is it?

I'm not trying to pick on Trevor personally.
I've read hundreds of his posts - he has thrown his share of stones.
I just thought he could catch one, and realize that this was at the
same level of many of his posts.

He has also answered hundreds of posts very well.
On balance I think that he is definitely an asset to this group.

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:29:24 -0500, "Ed Marks" >
wrote:

>Trevor,
>
>I'm with you - I don't get his response - you were just sharing your
>experience with these kits and your hopes for the new one. How can anyone,
>but WE, know how these will turn out since they're a new product. You can
>only hope that they'll turn out well and worth the money.
>
>Good luck with this one!
>
>Ed
>
>
>
>"pinky" > wrote in message
.uk...
>>I have added this impolite poster to my blocked senders list. His response
>>was rude and uncalled for and will now be ignored in future.
>>
>> --
>> Trevor A Panther
>> In South Yorkshire, England
>> Remove "PSANTISPAM" from my address line to reply.
>> All outgoing mail is scanned by Norton
>> Anti Virus for your protection too!
>> "
>> <snip><snip>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>