"usual suspect" > wrote in message
...
> C. James Strutz wrote:

> You're a ****ing liar, James. You know how I know? Because you started out
> by saying one thing and when pressed about it you quickly switched tacks,
> as though calling someone "unconventional" and suggesting his politics are
> far outside the mainstream is a compliment. Then you switched tacks again
> and raised issues like running and hunting which had *NOTHING* whatsoever
> to do with your original, shitty remarks.

You're ****ed because I'm not going to play your games.

> You also write that giving specifics for something you NOW say you meant
> to be flattering would "fuel an even more aggressive debate." That raises
> my eyebrows. Why would *compliments* fuel an aggressive debate, James? Is
> it because your remarks weren't intended to be so flattering in the first
> place?

They weren't meant to be complimentary or overly critical, they were neutral
comments AS I SAID BEFORE. They were meant to be honest observations. I'm
not going to play your games because YOU will escalate things into a
clubbing match. I keep telling you that and you don't seem to get it. Well
you have your clubbing match anyway, happy now?

> I just went back and reviewed the history of this whole issue. Your
> constant wiggling and wavering have been over saying one thing and then
> claiming you meant something else. You're a spineless, gutless coward.

What's amazing to me is you conveniently misread things, turn people's words
around on them, exaggerate "facts", move goalposts, provoke people, gang up
on people with your anti-vegan cohorts, become abusive and rude, and a host
of other shitty tactics to make your case. And you accuse me of "wiggling
and wavering" and calling me a "spineless, gutless coward". Not only are you
a hypocrite but you have the emotional maturity of a 6 year old. Grow up.