"Retard" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 22:11:14 GMT, "Ted Bell" >
wrote:
>
> >"Retard" > wrote in message
...
> >> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 13:30:08 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >> >"Retard" > wrote in message
...
> >> >> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 12:40:40 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >> >>>"Retard" > wrote
> >> >>>> On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 20:16:30 GMT, usual suspect
>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>Retard wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>I reconsidered my initial evaluations upon a course of
education.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Then explain
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>My error stemmed principally from semantics and definitions.
> >> >>>>>I did not then realize veganism was about food rather than
politics.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> That doesn't explain why you initially thought Jon's argument
> >> >>>> in promoting his strawman vegan fallacy
> >> >>>
> >> >>>True vegan fallacy.
> >> >>
> >> >> For a start, the first premise is false since meat can
> >> >> be sourced without killing animals.
> >> >
> >> >Meat is not obtained from roadkill
> >>
> >> It can be and is scavenged,
> >
> >No one in the U.S. or the UK who is a "vegan" would eat roadkill if she
> >weren't a "vegan".
>
> They can do

No. No one who becomes a "vegan" ever considered eating roadkill.