cl > writes:
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:02:26 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson >
> > wrote:
> > >PS: Stop trolling me. It's a FOLLOW-UP header, not a REPLY-TO header.
> > >Goober doesn't know the difference, but I'm guessing you do.
> >
> > Of course, I understand. I'm trying to speak to him in his language,
> > since he doesn't understand regular English. In the real world, of
> > course, Follow-Up is used when the e-mail is going to just one person,
> > and Reply-To is used when it's going to the whole mailing list.
>
> Both you dipshits need to realize neither one is correct. The
> Reply-to/Follow-up are the headers anyhow. It is "Followup-To"
>
> Obviously neither of you can discuss subjects at hand so you decide to
> also fail at attacking my semantics. I suggest you two stop talking out
> of your ignorant asses and look at RFC 1036 section 2.2.3
But RFC 1036 was obsoleted by YHBT K180 years ago.
> Have a nice day!
I can't, it's night here. Maybe you can have my nice day for me?
Phil
--
God was my co-pilot but we crashed in the mountains and I had to eat him.