In article >, Michel Boucher
> writes:

>"Peter Aitken" > wrote in
r.com:
>
>> This group has no moderator.

Hehe, that's what yoose think.... see those strings attached all about yoose
bodies... Ahahahahahahahahaha. . . .


>When a newsgroup is first formed it
>> has a charter that specifies, among other things, whether it is
>> moderated or not. Most are not - rec.food.recipes is one of the
>> few that is, IIRC. So you cannot just say "let's get a moderator
>> for this group." Rather you would have to start a new group, say
>> rec.food.cooking.moderated, that is defined as moderated from the
>> start.
>
>But that would be an uphill battle and a general waste of time. The
>attempt to create a group called rec.food.vegetables, if you recall,
>was properly trounced by one of the largest no votes in Usenet history.
>


---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."