On 6/3/2021 6:01 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
> On 6/3/2021 4:42 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>> On Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 10:12:56 AM UTC-10, wolfy's new
>> skateboard wrote:
>>> On 6/3/2021 12:17 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 11:52:08 AM UTC-10, wolfy's new
>>>> skateboard wrote:
>>>>> On 6/2/2021 3:35 PM, Lucretia Borgia wrote:
>>>>>> I won't keep repeating though in case I come
>>>>>> over like I own a Nissan Leaf :-®
>>>>>
>>>>> Battery power in the frozen north, what could go wrong with that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Then again, no block heater to **** with.
>>>>
>>>> I can't say how the new Ford electric F-150 will work in the frozen
>>>> North but it's certainly rocking the truck world. My guess is that
>>>> it'll be the "killer app" of the electric vehicle world.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKIRfPjR-To
>>>>
>>> Ford says they will sell 40% electric vehicles by 2030 - which is not so
>>> far off.
>>>
>>> Who will make 40% more power for our aging and faulty electrical grid
>>> and what kind of power will it be with Xiden ****ing all over natural
>>> gas and coal?
>>>
>>> Make book on this - bird killing windmills that ice up and fail and
>>> daytime only solar will NOT step in to save the day.
>>>
>>> Also charging stations that take 30-45 minutes are useless for anyone
>>> making a road trip, working delivery, or not charging at home overnight.
>>>
>>> We're heading for ANOTHER major gubmint-conned "cash for klunkers"
>>> disaster, but this time it will brown out the home power for the rest of
>>> the sheople.
>>>
>>> What say you?
>>
>> If history has taught us anything, it is that people want to buy cars
>> with the latest tech features. They want push-button starts, backup
>> cameras, and touch screens. My guess is that piston engines are going
>> to be as desirable as white-wall tires well before 2030.Â* Gas engines
>> will be seen as an archaic throwback to the past, in much the same way
>> we see the steam engine. Piston engine technology whether internal, or
>> external combustion, is pretty lame anyway i.e., inefficient. This
>> means that we're going to have to build-up a power
>> infrastructure/network in a hurry. My guess is that this means we're
>> going to have to go nuclear. As always, 1 + 1 will always equal 2.
>>
>
>
> Around here the fad imposed by the brilliant city thinkers is to remove
> lanes from our roads.Â* They want people to take magic carpets, not drive.
>
Do tell, and where is this happening?

Cali-phonyland perhaps?