On Sun, 30 May 2021 07:24:41 -0700 (PDT), bruce bowser
> wrote:

>On Saturday, May 29, 2021 at 10:00:01 PM UTC-4, Quinn C wrote in alt.usage.english:
>> * charles:
>> > In article >,
>> > Pamela > wrote:
>> >> On 15:07 28 May 2021, Quinn C said:
>> >
>> >>> "Champagne" is just one of many subgroups of sparkling wine. If you
>> >>> insist on distinguish it, you shouldn't conflate Sekt and Cava,
>> >>> either. But those don't have the same level of branding power behind
>> >>> them.
>> >
>> >> Champagne is a sparkling white wine from Champagne. It could hardly be
>> >> simpler.
>> >
>> > naturally sparkling, not with added sparkle.
>> I haven't heard of wine with added sparkle. Sekt, Cava, Prosecco, Asti,
>> Crémant
>
>and Pét-Nat ?
>
>> all have natural sparkle, and most of them are actually produced with
>> the méthode champenoise. So are many American sparkling wines.
>>
>> --
>> The need of a personal pronoun of the singular number and common
>> gender is so desperate, urgent, imperative, that ... it should long
>> since have grown on our speech -- The Atlantic Monthly (1878)
Ask them, theyre here. "You can stop saying that now. Thank you."
--
This is a message from the other Dave Smith.