On 5/28/2021 4:30 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2021 16:14:11 -0600, wolfy's new skateboard
> > wrote:
>
>> On 5/28/2021 4:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 May 2021 15:41:15 -0600, wolfy's new skateboard
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> He buys DAs who release cop killers on the street!
>>>
>>> You mean he didn't want the death penalty.
>>
>> I do.
>>
>>> How is that releasingsomeone on the street?
>>
>> Easy answer:
>
> (...)
>
> He still only didn't want the death penalty. You frame that into "he
> wants to put him back on the street". That's how fake news works.
No, it's how actions and beliefs coincide in the real world.
The proof you deleted specifically demonstrated that with the DAs
complicity the prisons are now opened in Caliphonya and actual murderers
walk free.
Soros got himself the governor, DA and the parole board - some trick indeed.
> Personally, I think that people who have committed certain crimes,
> should never be released. But there is no western country that applies
> that thinking.
>
> (...)
Well...you're misinformed again I'm afraid:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_imprisonment
In many countries around the world, particularly in the Commonwealth,
courts have the authority to pass prison terms that may amount to de
facto life imprisonment.
A few countries allow for a minor to be given a lifetime sentence with
no provision for eventual release; these include Antigua and Barbuda,
Argentina (only over the age of 16),[3] Australia, Belize, Brunei, Cuba,
Dominica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, the Solomon Islands, Sri
Lanka, and the United States.
Plenty of "red nations" where life imprisonment is active, many in the West:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...MapNew2020.png
>>> Most civilised countries don't even have the
>>> death penalty.
>>>
>>> (...)
>>
>> Your notion of "civilised" [sic] is rejected as ineffectual nannying.
>
> Many US states don't have the death penalty either.
So?
>> Yes, all one need do is look at the promise he kept and it allcomes clear:
>>
>> https://magapill.com/
>
> I guess you couldn't find a more biased website 
>
> (...)
I observe you have NO CAPACITY at all to rebut or factually refute the
data submitted.
You lose again.
Btw - any given citation correlates to a news media link, even from the
fake news:
https://magapill.com/
"US GDP booms at 33.1% rate in Q3 beating expectations
Source
Archive:
Third-quarter gross domestic product, a measure of the total goods and
services produced in the July-to-September period, expanded at a 33.1%
annualized pace, according to the department's initial estimate for the
period.
The gain came after a 31.4% plunge in the second quarter and was better
than the 32% estimate from economists surveyed by Dow Jones. The
previous post-World War II record was the 16.7% burst in the first
quarter of 1950.
Markets reacted positively to the news, with Wall Street erasing a loss
at the open and turning mostly positive."
Story:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/29/us-g...rter-2020.html
U.S. GDP booms at 33.1% rate in Q3, better than expected
PUBLISHED THU, OCT 29 2020
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/29/us-g...rter-2020.html
Oh my, you splayed yourself open this time.
>>>> Our major problem is that just 5 corporations control almost all media =
>>>> fake news and now way to avoid it.
>>>
>>> Fox News is the biggest spreader of fake news.
>>
>> Nope, not even in the ballpark!
>>
>> http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/...p?q=1485017756
>
> You live in a sheltered extreme right-wing bubble.
You trade in partisan "us v. them" insults as you are incapable of
objective and non partisan analysis.
> You only receive
> news that reinforces your already existing extreme right-wing bias.
>
> I hope you're quite snug and comfortable there
>
> (...)
IKYABWAI?
Even worse you delete facts and pretend they never existed.
Sahmeful, even for a marxist lib.
>>> Religious fanaticism is a mental disorder. I don't want a PM with a
>>> mental disorder.
>>
>> All humans have mental disorders and faith is not one of them.
>
> Faith is one thing, fanaticism is another.
Your grading is suspect if not wholly inaccurate.
>>>> And your nation is China's coal whore, so...
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> (...)
>>
>> So don't bite the hands that feed you.
>
> It doesn't feed me. I'll bite it.
If you live there it feeds you entire nation and its tax structure.
You LOSE again, foolish liar:
https://www.news.com.au/finance/econ...7500c147f4e764
Between ports, energy companies, dairy processors, cattle stations,
waterfront mansions and country estates €“ just how much of Australia
does China own?
Our biggest trading partner also remains one of our biggest sources of
foreign investment, although rising tensions between the two countries
have resulted in a sharp drop-off over the past two years.
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, China was our
ninth-largest foreign investor at the end of 2019 with a total of $78.2
billion, accounting for 2 per cent of the total €“ however a large amount
of Chinese investment comes via Hong Kong, which comes in fifth place
with $141 billion, or 3.7 per cent of the total.
New Chinese commercial investment in Australia nearly halved in 2019 to
just $2.5 billion, according to the Australian National Universitys
Chinese Investment in Australia (CHIIA) database, having fallen for
three consecutive years since peaking at $15.8 billion in 2016.
Slightly different figures produced by the University of Sydney and
KPMG, which are based on date of contracting, put Chinese investment in
Australia at $3.4 billion in 2019, a 58.4 per cent fall on the previous
year.
CHIIA, which is considered the most accurate source of Chinese
investment figures as it is based on actual transactions, showed major
falls in mining, real estate, commercial property, manufacturing and
agriculture, but modest gains in construction, education and finance.
€śJudging from the information so far this year, wed expect Chinese
investment to be lower in 2020,€ť lead analyst Mary Ming Sheng told The
Australian Financial Review in September. €śThats partly because of
COVID-19 but also because the Australian investment environment has
tightened.€ť
>> You're a 2nd tier natural resources play, and little more.
>
> I don't know what that means.
Well you cogitate on it a spell then and see if you can winkle something
out.
>>> There are things that still need to be solved, but sustainable energy
>>> is the only way to preserve the planet.
>>
>> Not so.
>>
>> We could let a plandemic wipe us back to 500 million or so and it would
>> all be peachy!
>
> Sustainable energy seems to be a nicer solution.
Not with bird-killing wind farms that freeze up and fail and solar that
is daylight only useful.
> Of course, you think
> sustainable energy is communism! "Step back, Satan!"
Depends who is DEMANDING we do so.
Right now we have several states banning the sale gasoline cars as of 2030.
That's sheer MADNESS as our grid is aging and failing and we have NO new
sources of power to account for a rise in electric car grid energy
consumption from a few percent to over half.
You know these things to be true, but you ponce around waving your
tattered "beliefs" like a dirty underwear flag.
Clean it up!