On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 1:45:54 PM UTC-4, US Janet wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 10:50:50 -0600, wolfy's new skateboard
> > wrote:
>
> >On 5/27/2021 10:40 AM, US Janet wrote:
> >> On Thu, 27 May 2021 12:06:55 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 5/27/2021 11:42 AM, wolfy's new skateboard wrote:
> >>>> On 5/26/2021 2:52 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:07:49 PM UTC-4, Jim Lahey wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes. It's all going to plan, unfortunately. Who in their right mind
> >>>>>> thinks it's economically wise to simply print trillions of dollars and
> >>>>>> give it away? The agenda is to crash the economy in order to begin the
> >>>>>> transition to a new world wide currency and economy.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Your tinfoil hat is slipping. Best adjust it so the Jewish Space Lasers
> >>>>> can't control your thinking anymore.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cindy Hamilton
> >>>>>
> >>>> Why did you invoke the Jews?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do they have something to do with predatory international banksters?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I guess you don't keep up with things like Marjorie Taylor Greene.
> >>> Jewish space lasers were blamed for the California forest fires.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-ta...e-news-1574928
> >>
> >> Have you ever noticed how her face looks like Neanderthal man? All
> >> the bone structure is there. Make up doesn't hide it.
> >> Janet US
> >>
> >
> >Wow - hateful body-shaming shrew time here!
> >
> >Should we parse what happens when a cawk meets AOC's massive horse chompers?
> >
> >https://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/med...6fd8 d077438c
> >
> >Bob it tyme!
> >
> Well, did you notice her facial structure? BTW, not body shaming.
> Just commented on something that strikes me every time I see her.
> Given your postings, I never would have expected you to recognize or
> be sensitive to to comments of any kind.
> Janet US

Janet, its instinct for a man to express sensitivity to a lady if she dresses seductively, has a great body, looks hot as possible, has a beautiful face, etc.. Otherwise, the sensitivity isn't there (with extremely few exceptions).