Bruce wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:32:42 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> > wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 3:27:12 PM UTC-10, Leo wrote:
>>> On 2021 Mar 18, , dsi1 wrote
>>> (in >):
>>>> Time Machine? Apple's getting way advanced!
>>>> I had to look that one up since I don't know nothing about no Apple. Windows
>>>> has something similar with System Restore although that one just reverts your
>>>> machine to the point in time that you take a "snapshot" of the system. It
>>>> does not actively back up your drive. Using an external drive is a good move.
>>>> Most people using System Restore will use their single internal drive. I
>>>> don't have any options like that. I can live with that.
>>> When one's internal drive fails, System Restore won´t be of much use to
>>> them. The odds of two drives failing at once are slim. With Time Machine, I
>>> can go back a year or two to retrieve old single files at the time I choose.
>>> I can, but I´ve never had the need.
>>> System Restore on a external drive is a far better option for everybody using
>>> Windows, if that option is available to them. External drives are real cheap
>>> now.
>>> If you want lightning in a box, replace your internal HDD with a SSD. I
>>> don´t know how that works in the Windows world.
>>
>> You're certainly right about using an external drive. OTOH, one day you'll end up with a computer that has no USB port to connect to. My son's latest computer has two drives. They are both solid state drives but one's faster than the other. I don't don't know how that works in the Window's world either. For anything I want to save
> on my computer, I got a 64 GB Micro SD card. It's in a internal slot but it's seen as an external drive. It probably cost around $20.
>
> Mickey Mouse computing.
>

Yep, 64 GB is nowhere near large enough to keep your butt sniffing
notes on.