On 3/10/2021 4:33 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 23:01:27 GMT, Pamela >
> wrote:
>
>> On 22:50 9 Mar 2021, Sqwertz said:
>>
>>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:09:26 -0500, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/9/2021 4:51 PM, Sheldon Martin wrote:
>>>>> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt
>>>>> nothing, or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out her
>>>>> massive bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two weeks,
>>>>> hoping I get her again.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Got mine yesterday and go April 5 for the second.
>>>
>>> It's unanimous. I got mine yesterday, too. I go back the 29th.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> It doesn't seem long ago when you posted Covid didn't pose a risk and
>> you even calculated the people you would have to touch even to come
>> close to it.
>>
>> Even Covidiots eventually see sense ... or die.
>
> ...die at a rate of less than a single percentage point. Yes, let's
> all get behind an basically untested and unproven vaccine, using
> technology never trialed on humans before, with no evidence of
> efficacy or reducing the spread of the virus. OK, makes sense.
>

Yes, because what you say is not true. It was tested extensively with
good results. The technology has actually existed for some time but has
just not been used in a mass vaccine like this.

If no evidence of efficacy was shown it would not be approved.