|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|
|
Tomatoes - faulty measurements?
Taxed and Spent wrote:
> On 2/27/2021 8:34 AM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
> > On 2/27/2021 8:20 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> >> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:06:37 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> >> > wrote:
> > >
> >>> On 2/27/2021 8:00 AM, Graham wrote:
> >>>> On 2021-02-27 6:04 a.m., Snag wrote:
> >>>>> On 2/26/2021 11:03 PM, Graham wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2021-02-26 9:45 p.m., Snag wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> Â*Â* So "it's for my own good" makes it OK . I wouldn't find
> it so >>>>>>> annoying if this were truly the killer pandemic they
> claimed . Yes , >>>>>>> those with compromised health were hardest
> hit . But the fact remains >>>>>>> that this thing has a fatality
> rate of .03-.05% , down in the weeds >>>>>>> with the common cold and
> seasonal flu . Another factor that screams >>>>>>> fraud and
> conspiracy is that hydroxychloroquine all at once is a >>>>>>> viable
> treatment - after hundreds of thousands that could have been >>>>>>>
> treated died while "they" were screaming no no no it'll kill you .
> > > > > > >
> >>>>>> Wow! So you know more than all those research scientists that
> did >>>>>> careful studies and proved that what you write is a load
> of codswallop! >>>>>> I'm surprised that Fauci hasn't contacted you
> with a job offer!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> >>>>> Â* I know that other trials has great results , and were
> quashed by the >>>>> liberal media .
> > > > >
> >>>> Oh! Of course it's ALWAYS the liberal media.
> > > > >
> >>>> I know that there were doctors and researchers that were
> >>>>> canceled for not spouting the party line .Â* You really should
> consider >>>>> watching/reading something other than mainstream media
> .
> > > > >
> >>>> Liek FuxNews and QAnon?
> >>>> FFS, take your head out of your arse!
> > > > >
> > > >
> >>> "In this retrospective observational study of SARS-CoV-2 infected
> >>> non-hospitalized patients hydroxychloroquine exposure was
> associated >>> with a decreased rate of subsequent hospitalization.
> Additional >>> exploration of hydroxychloroquine in this mildly
> symptomatic outpatient >>> population is warranted."
> > > >
> >>>
>
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.c...79-021-05773-w
> > >
> >> Open access published - for a fee. Try again.
> > >
> >
> > no fee for me.
> >
>
>
> Our findings in the outpatient setting are in conflict with prior
> observational studies conducted among hospitalized patients
> potentially highlighting differences in effect based on the severity
> of disease [27]. Following an initial infection by SARS-CoV-2
> resulting in attack of alveolar epithelial cells patients may develop
> a hyper-inflammatory state characterized by activation of the innate
> immune system and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and
> chemokines. Patients who experience this "cytokine storm progress
> rapidly to respiratory failure and multi-organ failure [28,29,30,31].
> In these hospitalized patients the weak anti-inflammatory effects of
> hydroxychloroquine may be insufficient to block the cytokine cascade,
> whereas more potent immunosuppressive agents such as dexamethasone
> and tocilizumab have been associated with beneficial effects [21, 32,
> 33].
>
> By contrast, hydroxychloroquine has anti-viral effects, decreasing
> SARS-CoV-2 viral load, and thus may be more suited in preventing the
> significant tissue damage needed to incite the hyper-inflammatory
> state [5, 34]. This would position hydroxychloroquine earlier in the
> clinical course, at the time of early infection, prior to
> hospitalization need [35].
Date site
|