On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:00:22 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:

>On 2/27/2021 12:46 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:36:42 -0800, Taxed and Spent
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/27/2021 12:10 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:25 -0800 (PST), dsi1
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 3:08:51 AM UTC-10, Snag wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/27/2021 12:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might want to revise your figures on the fatality rate. It is currently about 1.8%. The numbers I'm using is 28,411,273 cases, 508,127 deaths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe if you investigate that , you'll find those numbers were
>>>>>> produced before they changed the way they counted fatalities - those who
>>>>>> died "with" vs those that died "from" .
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Snag
>>>>>> In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
>>>>>> We shot them
>>>>>
>>>>> The number of people that died with Covid-19 = 508,127
>>>>> The number of people that died from Covid-19 = 11,400
>>>>> That leaves about half a million people with unexplained deaths? That's awfully weird.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am betting the intersection of sets of those who think the Covid
>>>> death numbers are so low and that Orange Face won the election is 100%
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The proper way to look at this is years of life lost. It would put
>>> things into proper perspective.
>>
>> Make up whatever you want when you want to play. Why would you want to
>> look at it that way? Why do you think that is proper perspective?
>>
>> That isn't a stat that is used to discuss disease mortality/morbidity,
>> but have fun with your data.
>>
>> Since other diseases are not analyzed this way, it'd be hard to do
>> comparisons.
>>
>
>you are wrong.

I apologize and have now seen some YLL calcs.