On 2/27/2021 12:46 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:36:42 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/2021 12:10 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:25 -0800 (PST), dsi1
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 3:08:51 AM UTC-10, Snag wrote:
>>>>> On 2/27/2021 12:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You might want to revise your figures on the fatality rate. It is currently about 1.8%. The numbers I'm using is 28,411,273 cases, 508,127 deaths.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe if you investigate that , you'll find those numbers were
>>>>> produced before they changed the way they counted fatalities - those who
>>>>> died "with" vs those that died "from" .
>>>>> --
>>>>> Snag
>>>>> In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
>>>>> We shot them
>>>>
>>>> The number of people that died with Covid-19 = 508,127
>>>> The number of people that died from Covid-19 = 11,400
>>>> That leaves about half a million people with unexplained deaths? That's awfully weird.
>>>
>>>
>>> I am betting the intersection of sets of those who think the Covid
>>> death numbers are so low and that Orange Face won the election is 100%
>>>
>>
>>
>> The proper way to look at this is years of life lost. It would put
>> things into proper perspective.
>
> Make up whatever you want when you want to play. Why would you want to
> look at it that way? Why do you think that is proper perspective?
>
> That isn't a stat that is used to discuss disease mortality/morbidity,
> but have fun with your data.
>
> Since other diseases are not analyzed this way, it'd be hard to do
> comparisons.
>

you are wrong.