Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|
Tomatoes - faulty measurements?
On 2/27/2021 8:20 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:06:37 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/2021 8:00 AM, Graham wrote:
>>> On 2021-02-27 6:04 a.m., Snag wrote:
>>>> On 2/26/2021 11:03 PM, Graham wrote:
>>>>> On 2021-02-26 9:45 p.m., Snag wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Â*Â* So "it's for my own good" makes it OK . I wouldn't find it so
>>>>>> annoying if this were truly the killer pandemic they claimed . Yes ,
>>>>>> those with compromised health were hardest hit . But the fact remains
>>>>>> that this thing has a fatality rate of .03-.05% , down in the weeds
>>>>>> with the common cold and seasonal flu . Another factor that screams
>>>>>> fraud and conspiracy is that hydroxychloroquine all at once is a
>>>>>> viable treatment - after hundreds of thousands that could have been
>>>>>> treated died while "they" were screaming no no no it'll kill you .
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow! So you know more than all those research scientists that did
>>>>> careful studies and proved that what you write is a load of codswallop!
>>>>> I'm surprised that Fauci hasn't contacted you with a job offer!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Â* I know that other trials has great results , and were quashed by the
>>>> liberal media .
>>>
>>> Oh! Of course it's ALWAYS the liberal media.
>>>
>>> I know that there were doctors and researchers that were
>>>> canceled for not spouting the party line .Â* You really should consider
>>>> watching/reading something other than mainstream media .
>>>
>>> Liek FuxNews and QAnon?
>>> FFS, take your head out of your arse!
>>>
>>
>> "In this retrospective observational study of SARS-CoV-2 infected
>> non-hospitalized patients hydroxychloroquine exposure was associated
>> with a decreased rate of subsequent hospitalization. Additional
>> exploration of hydroxychloroquine in this mildly symptomatic outpatient
>> population is warranted."
>>
>> https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.c...79-021-05773-w
>
> Open access published - for a fee. Try again.
>
no fee for me.
|