On 2/6/2021 5:35 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 2/5/2021 1:07 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2021-02-05 11:31 a.m., Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
>>>> Not too old for sex if you're willing to lower your standards.
>>>> I won't do that. There is a serious supply side shortage in my age
>>>> group. I've accepted that so don't let it bother you, troll.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I guess it depends on what your standards are based on. Looks alone?
>>> Chest size?
>>>
>>> I know three women that are 70+ that are very attractive. I keep
>>> contact with them on a regular basis too.
>>
>> My wife is a babe at 74. Her sister is a babe at 83. The last time I saw
>> my aunt she was 88 and looked great.
>
> You're morphing the conversation here, Dave. Old women can certainly be
> attractive unless they try to hang on to youth via gobs of makeup. That
> doesn't work so well. It often makes things worse.
>
> The talk was about sexually attractive. I would never describe any old
> woman as a "babe."
>
>


You call them all "babe" because at that age you can't remember any
names. And they might not remember their own name anyway.