On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:04:24 -0700, Taxed and Spent wrote:

> The lack of wing tips is probably the result of a lawsuit.

If someone sued about bones, would that not make the 'winglet'
pieces more dangerous? (i.e. bigger bones, etc.)

Unless advertised as 'boneless', how could a litigant expect
a jury to believe bones should be absent in any piece of meat?

Much more likely, most people don't eat the tips.