On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>
> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
> >>
> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
> >> of the potter.
> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
> >>
> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
> >
> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>
> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?

I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.