On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>>
>> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>> of the potter.
>> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>>
>> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>>
>>
>>
>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>>
>> --
>>
>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>
>Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.

You're a theist preacher. Is that better?