(PENMART01) wrote in
:

> Michel Boucher writes:
>
>>Nancy Young wrote:
>>
>>>'d rather get super cheap eggs all year and deal with the
>>>holiday bump.
>>
>>You gets what you pays for. Super-cheap eggs...yum :-\
>>
>>So, glut is fine with you as long as it results in a saving over the
>>real price of egg production? You are prepared to accept falsified
>>seasonal shortages for the purpose of generating greater wealth for
>>the middle-man in exchange for a product that may not be exportable
>>because of its low production cost and hence questionable quality?
>
> Other than for the shells hens are incapable of producing lesser (or
> higher) "quality" eggs so long as they produce eggs, regardless of
> diet... the nutritional value will be identical by weight. When a
> bird is ill in a way that would affect its egg's viability to produce
> young it simply ceases egg production, nature's way... same as it's
> natural that you spout bullshit about topics of which you know
> absolutely nothing... Michel Boucher, in every which way possible you
> are a big fat zero ("0")... you are by far the most ignorant,
> pretentious, and LOUDESTMOUTHED of all the RFC posters... you're a
> communist/moslem piece-of-shit spineless freedom froggie windbag.

Did I say egg quality had to do with the nutritional value? Not once did
that concept ever pass from my fingers to the screen. However, there are
lesser grades of eggs, related mostly to cleanliness, size, volume of air
cell and quality of albumen. I refer you to a quick reference on the
Georgia Egg Commission, a government situated within the borders of the
Untied States, just so you don't think I invent this stuff (which obviously
I don't).

http://www.georgiaeggs.org/pages/grading.html

Feel free to suggest to yourself quietly that I am lying when I point to
this site.