On Tue, 09 Apr 2019 08:12:35 +0700, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 18:34:36 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>>On 2019-04-08 5:26 p.m., Je?us wrote:
>>> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:22:05 -0600, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2019-04-08 3:17 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 10:45:33 AM UTC-10, graham wrote:
>>>>>> I saw the film in 1970 in a London cinema and regretted the waste of
>>>>>> admission to see it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your reaction was not dissimilar to a lot of people's. I had mixed feelings about it when I saw it with my mom back in 68. What made the film memorable for me was that I saw it with my mom. My mom hardly ever took me to movies. I saw three movies with her. "Thunderball", "2001: A Space Odyssey", and "Bonnie and Clyde." Beats me why she took me to see those flicks. As far as I know, our family was not big on going to the movies. We actually kinda lived like monks.
>>>>>
>>>> My immediate reaction as I left the theatre was that Kubrick ran out of
>>>> money and cobbled together bits and pieces on the cutting room floor.
>>>> My opinion hasn't changed!
>>>
>>> So, you'd also enjoy Clockwork Orange then.
>>>
>>Haven't seen it. I'm not a cinephile.
>
>I'm not either... anymore. Not since movies went digital/CGI.

I mainly watch Dutch/Flemish and Australian movies and I rarely see
CGI.