FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

Bruce[_28_]

On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:12:35 -0500, Gary > wrote:

>Bruce wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 04:57:15 -0600,
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 10:50:05 GMT, Pamela >
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 21:28 23 Feb 2019, Dave Smith > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 2019-02-23 2:19 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
>> >>>> On Saturday, February 23, 2019 at 9:10:47 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>> Personally, I prefer the mined ancient sea salt, now just
>> >>>>>>> called salt. The ocean was much more pure when that salt formed
>> >>>>>>> in ancient and long gone oceans.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Not forgetting pink Himalayan salt. Heh!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The Himalayas were not always mountains. The mountains are there
>> >>>>> now because plates of rock were forced up upward, exposing layers
>> >>>>> of rock and minerals that had been buried. Besides, Himalayan salt
>> >>>>> is not from the Himalayas. It is from the Salt range in Punjab.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The appeal of seasoning your food with fossil salt 600 to 800 million
>> >>>> years old is undeniable. Unfortunately, having to bite down on
>> >>>> crushed rocky material pretty much killed that idea for me.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Fossil salt? WTH are on you about Willis?
>> >>
>> >>Who is Willis?
>> >
>> >Wow you must be a youngin'
>>
>> About as young as me. Willlis?
>
>Referring to a well known phrase on an old sitcom
>Copy this below and enter it in to Google
> "What you talkin about Willis"

I can hear the laughing tape already.