"Boron Elgar" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:56:28 -0800, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>"Boron Elgar" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:06:14 -0800, "Cheri" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Obviously some people do because they seem to be popular. I dont' care
>>>>for
>>>>them much myself. What I found odd today was buying Gold Medal Flour
>>>>which
>>>>I
>>>>don't usually have on hand but will need for holiday baking, when I
>>>>opened
>>>>it to transfer to a container, it said on the top of the bag to resist
>>>>eating it until it's cooked, duh, does anyone really need that
>>>>instruction?
>>>>Is anyone hitting a bag of flour with a big spoon to eat mouthfuls of
>>>>it?
>>>>LOL
>>>>
>>>>Cheri
>>>>
>>>>Cheri
>>>
>>> There is a salmonella risk with raw flour, which, of course, can wind
>>> up in cookie dough or cake batter, and folks are known to take a bite
>>> of the dough or lick the beaters from a cake.
>>>
>>> https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2018/...es-cake-mixes/
>>>
>>> https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/Con.../ucm508450.htm
>>
>>
>>I know that, I was talking about the way it was worded on the top of the
>>bag.
>>
>>Cheri
>
> Why would that wording be any more unusual than wording on other raw
> foods that one would not likely eat before it cooking? Or the warnings
> on handling of other uncooked foods?

With other foods, the product itself is in the package. In the case of
flour, the only thing in the bag is flour, not raw cookie dough etc. The
point is, *I* found it odd, YMMV

Cheri