A question about a question
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:31:25 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:
>On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 2:51:14 PM UTC-5, Druce wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 12:33:01 -0700 (PDT), "
>> > wrote:
>>
>> She
>> >does know her law and that's what seems to get the litigants dander up when
>> >she doesn't rule in their favor because they're wrong and/or stupid.
>>
>> She knows her law because she studied law. Anybody can study law.
>>
>True, but some are better at practicing and quoting it than others.
Yes.
>> >If she makes a shit pot of money, good for her!! As she has stated more
>> >than once "they pay me because I'm smart."
>>
>> That sounds rather stupid.
>>
>She's smart enough to parlay her occupation into a multi-million dollar
>yearly salary. Sounds smart to me.
Yes, in that sense she's very successful. But that doesn't make her
any more likeable, of course.
>You don't like her, which is not
>surprising as you are not happy with anything American
Americans always say that. I don't like much American TV. Nor most
Australian TV. But most of the music that I like, is American. And
that's just one example.
>, don't watch her.
>No one is tying to a chair and forcing you to view her you; simple solution.
Yes, I don't lie awake at night, worrying about Judge Judy. Sometimes
I zap past her and keep watching for a bit. Australian daytime TV
doesn't offer much choice, apart from soaps, ads and tell sell.
|