In article >,
Steve Calvin > wrote:

> Well, given that my original post was time stamped at 2:40PM and my
> "retraction" was time stamped at 2:45 and you're reply was time
> stamped at 2:54 I rather doubt the sincerity. But it really doesn't
> matter to me one way or the other. No apology necessary, but
> appreciated. I'll chock it up to slow proliferation of posts through
> the servers.

The time stamp is when it's sent to your news server. However, it may
not reach other readers' news servers until much later--and the time
differential isn't necessarily uniform for different posts by the same
user.

--
to respond, change "spamless.invalid" with "optonline.net"
please mail OT responses only