On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:01:31 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
snip
>
>Never the less, that goes back to the issue of the father's rights when
>it comes to abortion. If the man can be held financially liable for the
>child, then it stands to reason that he should also be able to block a
>woman from having an abortion.
>
then he needs to take the child at birth. The right to lifers deny
women access to birth control and abortion even if rape and incest is
involved yet they take no responsibility for raising the child -- even
reduce or cut funding for low income children. Once they're born
right to life is no longer important.