On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 23:44:08 GMT, Dan Krueger
> wrote:

>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 01:18:38 GMT, Dan Krueger
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You would need his permission, in advance, of course. I would suggest a
>>>notarized affidavit. Unsolicited email will get you in *BIG* trouble with your
>>>ISP according to Kevin. Even a single email is outright harassment according
>>>to...Kevin.
>>>
>>
>> You were told in no uncertain terms to stay the hell out of my
>> mailbox, top-poster. You continued to mail me. Ask your ISP's abuse
>> desk what they think of that practice.
>
>Continued? Try responded...ONCE.

You mailed me after being told to stay out of my mailbox. That would
constitute a continuation of your earlier action.

What is your first language?

>My ISP's abuse desk? Haven't heard a peep. Maybe they, like any other rational
>person, would consider it to be a non-issue.

You're not fooling anyone by pretending that continuing to mail
someone after being told not to is both a violation of Netiquette and
of the AUP of most ISPs. You might be that pig-ignorant, but I doubt
it. I figure instead that you're being willfully obtuse.

I do notice that you stopped. Why is that? Hmmm?

>Top-poster? I'll go in the corner for a time out...
>
>>
>> Just for the record, your first childish e-mail consisted of the
>> following:
>>
>> "F- U"
>>
>It was appropriate. Post it in context, please.

Do your own homework, putz.


--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology