|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|
|
Chicken Amandine
On 2/11/2018 7:50 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:24:39 -0800, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>>> "Mike_Duffy" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 03:23:27 -0800, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't use Google. Could you post the link?
>>>>
>>>> I don't like the way Google (&bing & yahoo) tracks us. There is an
>>>> alternative:
>>>>
>>>> https://duckduckgo.com/
>>>>
>>>> They SAY they don't track us & sell personalized info about our
>>>> searches
>>>> to
>>>> advertisers.
>>>>
>>>> Anyways, here is the first link I found from "DuckDuckGo" for "Chiken
>>>> Amadine", because you said you were certain she was not pronouncing it
>>>> right and I applied some generic syllable shifts. The recipe seems
>>>> to be
>>>> what you described.
>>>>
>>>> I understand your concerns about Google, but I am fairly certain that
>>>> DuckDuckGo does not sell personalized data. They might very well sell
>>>> aggregate inferences, but this should be worth the added
>>>> functionality of
>>>> using a search engine that won't be rude to you when you make a polite
>>>> request.
>>>>
>>>> There were a LOT of ricipes listed. Here is the first one:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.tasteofhome.com/recipes/chicken-amandine
>>>
>>> Thanks! That recipe does contain the things that I said, however this
>>> casserole had no veggies in it. Just the chicken, almonds, rice and soup
>>> AFAIK and it was all baked in the oven. Nothing was cooked ahead. I
>>> do use
>>> that particular search engine from time to time and I will save the
>>> recipe.
>>
>> See?Â* Somebody found a reweciep for you and you shot it down.Â* I bet
>> nobody saw THAT coming, eh?
>>
>> **** off with your constant requests for suggestions.
>
> How did I shoot it down? I said I would save the recipe. It's just that
> the particular recipe from that link is a whole lot more work than the
> one my mom used to make. Hers had you dump everything in the casserole
> dish as is and then bake. No cooking of anything first.
>
> Why don't you go **** off with Dave? You two could have a right howling
> **** off match. I'll bet that would be fun for both of you.
+1!!!!!!
|