"Wcsjohn" > wrote in message =
...

> > http://www.prettycolors.com/bread%5F...ead/index.html

> Nice crumb for a quick bread.

Thanks.

T'was a yeast bread. Quick breads are those risen by chemical action,
as I understand it.

> Thank you for a fine example of a gnomic utterance ... but you say it =
in=20
> such an embroidered way, adding a mock deprecatory injunction to=20
> ignore your suggestion, that the meaning is lost in verbal persilage.

Persiflage?! (with an 'f')

Inasmuch as meanings are bound to get lost or mangled, it is well it=20
happens in an ornate, or otherwise entertaining, manner.

"williamwaller" > admonished in message =
news:mailman.26.1094415680.1141.rec.food.sourdough @mail.otherwhen.com...
with regard to my post =


>Read the fine print in that post. I saw the words: bread machine.

Actually >cheap bread machine<.

It was about inductive cognition. One might anticipate the outcome
of a long, cold process via a quick warm experiment. Kneading with
a bread machine is very thorough, quite easy, and entirely appropriate
to experimental quantities of dough, or even sourdough, which was=20
not a subject of my post. If one were motivated to stand aghast at=20
some such issue, my rhetorical application of yeast dough would=20
better serve.=20

> BM users, even in the "tenor of their twilight years" (a simply
> beautiful phrase) don't chill.

Like the gnomic allusion, it seems to be a lame attempt at senior =
bashing. =20
Neither poetic nor cogent.

---
DickA