sf wrote:
>
> jmcquown wrote:
> > True, but I'm required to have a land line for the security system.
> > Even if there was excellent reception, paying two phone bills didn't
> > make any sense.
> >
> There's no point in you putting down people who aren't tied to a
> landline, which is what you do.

I've never seen/read Jill "putting down people" that use cell phones.
She merely states that she needs the land line for her home and no
need to pay for 2 different voice phones. Same with me. Neither of us
need to use 500mb of data per month unlike some people here.