On Wed, 4 May 2016 09:47:17 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

> On 5/4/2016 9:23 AM, sf wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 May 2016 17:13:52 -0400, jmcquown >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/3/2016 4:17 PM, William wrote:
> >>> On 3 May 2016 13:21:04 GMT, notbob > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I don't usually post off-topic, but this time.....
> >>>>
> >>>> I let my cell phone acct lapse ....on purpose! Gee, I don't miss it
> >>>> one bit. I have no more cell phone capability, but I still have the
> >>>> device and it works pretty dang good, w/o the phone part.
> >>>>
> >>>> nb
> >>>
> >>> before Thomas Edison created the General Electric Corporation,
> >>> he invented electric light bulbs. Alot of people around the country
> >>> refused to use them prefering their oil lamps and candles to light
> >>> their homes at night. There were many who refused to pay $600 bucks
> >>> for one of Henry Ford's Model "T" Automobiles when they came out.
> >>>
> >>> Once they died off, their decendents saw these products as necessities
> >>> of life.
> >>>
> >>> William
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It's not the same thing. I haven't had a cell phone for years. I
> >> haven't missed it.
> >>
> > You don't have cell phone reception, so a cell phone would be a waste
> > of money.
> >
> >
> True, but I'm required to have a land line for the security system.
> Even if there was excellent reception, paying two phone bills didn't
> make any sense.
>
There's no point in you putting down people who aren't tied to a
landline, which is what you do.

--

sf