On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 09:30:02 +1000, Bruce > wrote:

>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 09:02:54 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:50:01 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:37:15 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:30:31 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:20:01 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 05:36:06 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:23:34 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>A disgrace to the stereotype! I shall report you to the Queen and she
>>>>>>>>will kick your ass!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If the Queen kicks anything, it would be an arse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Or perhaps a corgi when she's in a bad mood.
>>>>>
>>>>>As long as she doesn't kick the bucket.
>>>>
>>>>Not keen on the idea of King Charles then?
>>>
>>>That might be a big moment for Australia, actually.
>>
>>It'd be of significance in one way. Those trashy women's magazines
>>would be creaming their jeans over it, of course. In another way, most
>>Australians really couldn't care less, one way or the other.
>
>But it might lead to the republic. Isn't the succession when they'll
>hold the new plebiscite?

Surely they could hold another plebiscite at any time ?