onglet wrote:

>On 3/31/2016 6:17 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 2016-03-31 3:04 PM, Roy wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 12:03:14 PM UTC-6, Cheri wrote:
>>>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 2016-03-31 12:00 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/31/2016 11:40 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I did get it after the fact but did not find it even
>>>>>>>>>> remotely funny.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They don't do it to be funny. They do it to hurt you
>>>>>>>>> because they think it is clever. Watch all their friends
>>>>>>>>> applaud.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Except it isn't clever and just makes them look small and
>>>>>>>> mean. Unfortunately there seem to be a lot of those types
>>>>>>>> these days, or maybe it's just that the internet exposes them
>>>>>>>> like bugs under a scope now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheri
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ed didn't post that to be mean. He made a joke about the HOT!
>>>>>>> ice maker. She didn't "get it". Plain and simple.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have to make allowances for Cheri. She feels a need to step
>>>>>> in and protect Julie when poke at her stupidity because she
>>>>>> realizes that Julie is to stupid to stick up for herself..
>>>>>> .without getting caught in more lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would imagine that most here make allowances for you and your
>>>>> many, many, Julie stalking posts, yet you don't have the balls to
>>>>> speak to her directly, just taking potshots through others you big
>>>>> ol coward! Oh, and bite me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheri
>>>>
>>>> Well Cheri, I am not afraid to talk to Julie directly and do quite
>>>> often. She does need some chiding at times IMHO, and I'm not scared
>>>> to tell her so. Sometimes she takes it well and other times she tells
>>>> me to get stuffed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheri has proved herself an idiot once again. She is confused about me
>>> not talking to Julie directly. I do not reply to her directly because
>>> the woman is so totally screwed up, so full of bullshit and lies that I
>>> figured she was better off filtered and ignored. I post open messages
>>> that Julie is free to read if she wishes. Apparently she does because.
>>> despite having claimed to having me kill filed, she obviously reads my
>>> posts and replies to them directly. Cheri can feel free to look back at
>>> what I said about Julie lying and try to use that to contradict what I
>>> have said about Julie's lies.
>>>
>>> Stalking? I would have to go looking for her. It would be easy enough
>>> to take her out of the filter, but that would make it difficult to
>>> ignore her constant whining and lying. It is much more difficult to
>>> ignore her when so many other people are constantly replying to her,
>>> posting about and quoting her nonsense.
>>>
>>> In her lame attempt to rebut my comment about her realizing that Julie
>>> is too dumb to defend herself without resorting to lies, Cheri jumped
>>> in and did exactly what I said she does.
>>>
>>> I am not going to bother to ask her to forgive me for replying to her
>>> indirectly because her existence in this group as Julie's inept
>>> defender landed her in the bozo bin with her ilk.
>>>
>>>> I'm not perfect and don't pretend to be, although I can be quite
>>>> angelic at times...but sometimes the DEVIL prods me.
>>>
>>> I am angelic enough with my attempts to ignore Julie and her idiotic
>>> lies and bullshit. Opportunity knocks once, but temptation leans on
>>> the doorbell.
>>
>> You're the liar, Dave.
>
>
>Completely true.

You must realize that an "onglet" is hanger steak, tantamount to the
foreskin that's removed in a circumcision, therefore an "onglet" is
schmuck. LOL-LOL