On 2016-03-31 3:04 PM, Roy wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 12:03:14 PM UTC-6, Cheri wrote:
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 2016-03-31 12:00 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 3/31/2016 11:40 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>>>> I did get it after the fact but did not find it even
>>>>>>> remotely funny.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They don't do it to be funny. They do it to hurt you
>>>>>> because they think it is clever. Watch all their friends
>>>>>> applaud.
>>>>>
>>>>> Except it isn't clever and just makes them look small and
>>>>> mean. Unfortunately there seem to be a lot of those types
>>>>> these days, or maybe it's just that the internet exposes them
>>>>> like bugs under a scope now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheri
>>>>>
>>>> Ed didn't post that to be mean. He made a joke about the HOT!
>>>> ice maker. She didn't "get it". Plain and simple.
>>>
>>> You have to make allowances for Cheri. She feels a need to step
>>> in and protect Julie when poke at her stupidity because she
>>> realizes that Julie is to stupid to stick up for herself..
>>> .without getting caught in more lies.
>>
>> I would imagine that most here make allowances for you and your
>> many, many, Julie stalking posts, yet you don't have the balls to
>> speak to her directly, just taking potshots through others you big
>> ol coward! Oh, and bite me.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> Well Cheri, I am not afraid to talk to Julie directly and do quite
> often. She does need some chiding at times IMHO, and I'm not scared
> to tell her so. Sometimes she takes it well and other times she tells
> me to get stuffed.


Cheri has proved herself an idiot once again. She is confused about me
not talking to Julie directly. I do not reply to her directly because
the woman is so totally screwed up, so full of bullshit and lies that I
figured she was better off filtered and ignored. I post open messages
that Julie is free to read if she wishes. Apparently she does because.
despite having claimed to having me kill filed, she obviously reads my
posts and replies to them directly. Cheri can feel free to look back at
what I said about Julie lying and try to use that to contradict what I
have said about Julie's lies.

Stalking? I would have to go looking for her. It would be easy enough
to take her out of the filter, but that would make it difficult to
ignore her constant whining and lying. It is much more difficult to
ignore her when so many other people are constantly replying to her,
posting about and quoting her nonsense.

In her lame attempt to rebut my comment about her realizing that Julie
is too dumb to defend herself without resorting to lies, Cheri jumped
in and did exactly what I said she does.

I am not going to bother to ask her to forgive me for replying to her
indirectly because her existence in this group as Julie's inept
defender landed her in the bozo bin with her ilk.

> I'm not perfect and don't pretend to be, although I can be quite
> angelic at times...but sometimes the DEVIL prods me.

I am angelic enough with my attempts to ignore Julie and her idiotic
lies and bullshit. Opportunity knocks once, but temptation leans on the
doorbell.