"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 3/25/2016 10:19 PM, sf wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:23:55 -0600, graham > wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/03/2016 3:18 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 3/25/2016 12:17 AM, sf wrote:
>
>>>>>> If someone doesn't want to use bacon, a smoked pork chop works. They
>>>>>> usually come in packages of two. Use one and freeze the other.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yabbut... she wouldn't like smoked pork chops.
>>>>
>>>> I don't like any smoked foods or any pork chops.
>>>
>>> I thought you liked porkies!
>>
>> Which begs a question about why she used bacon.
>>
> Bean with bacon soup does require bacon. She said the soup was greasy
> even though she trimmed the fat off the bacon. She doesn't understand if
> you cook it down the fat renders out. Drain the bacon, pat it dry, let it
> sit a bit. Proceed from there. It's pretty simple.
>
Liar! I said it was *not* greasy! The soup was great and there w3ere no
problems wi9th it. Read the subject.

> No one is telling her she has to buy smoked bacon. But perhaps in Bothell
> there is no such thing as cured but not smoked raw bacon. Do they sell
> canned unsmoked bacon?

Yoder's sells canned bacon. I haven't tried it. Stop looking for problems.
There weren't any.