"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:43:00 -0800, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> On 1/24/2016 4:24 PM, Phil wrote:
>> >>> It would have to be really old not to have caption capability, but
>> >>> you
>> >>> do have to go to set-up features in your TV to turn them on and off,
>> >>> usually the remote has the feature, but not always. Refer to your TV
>> >>> manual, but if not having it you can find it online.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheri
>> >>
>> >> I have a TV so old you can still turn it on and off using buttons on
>> >> the
>> >> front of the actual set. You can change the channels and adjust the
>> >> volume by pushing buttons on the set, too. There is a set-up/menu
>> >> button
>> >> on the equally old remote which allows you to enable closed
>> >> captioning,
>> >> set a sleep timer, things like that.
>> >>
>> >> You don't have to disable the sound to see closed captions. If you
>> >> don't
>> >> want to hear the sound, mute it. For some reason she wants to hear
>> >> it,
>> >> even though she doesn't like Pati's voice. Okay. But she likely
>> >> could
>> >> turn on closed captions if she wanted to.
>> >
>> > I have to hear it because I need to know what she is doing. I would
>> > never
>> > use closed captioning even if I did have it. For one thing, I can't
>> > see
>> > well enough without my glasses on to see words on the screen. And I
>> > rarely wear my glasses at home. For another, I rarely really watch any
>> > show. I have the TV on and I listen to it, only looking at the screen
>> > once in a while.
>>
>> OK, but not using it is much different from not having it.
>>
> The question still remains about why she listens when she can find all
> the recipes on the internet and read them.

It's not just about the recipes. I like to watch her make things and hear
the stories behind them.