John Kuthe wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send
>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system
>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone
>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that
>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!!
>>>>>
>>>>> John Kuthe...
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them!
>>>>
>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been
>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Xeno
>>
>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail.
>
> Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$!
>
> John Kuthe...
>

And you or any of the rest of us have a mass market PC due to WHOM???

****in' A!

You and Bryan are equal measures STOOOPID!