On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 20:44:56 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Bruce" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:44:30 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
>>>news >>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:26:18 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
om...
>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:36:07 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:gh8l6b51pdrnv86evacbsp1mo4bp2d5mia@4ax .com...
>>>>>>>> An American insurance company will be the first insurer to offer UK
>>>>>>>> customers so-called "troll insurance" to protect them against the
>>>>>>>> costs and effects of being bullied online.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://uk.businessinsider.com/chubb-...5-12?r=US&IR=T
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I guess it can be very costly for business. Much easier here when you
>>>>>>>can
>>>>>>>filter hostile attacks from the spiteful and jealous retards with
>>>>>>>mental
>>>>>>>problems Aren't we lucky lol
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess I should ditch my old Agent software and get something that
>>>>>> filters smarter, but I'm too lazy.
>>>>>
>>>>>If it doesn't bother you, why change?
>>>>
>>>> True. I guess I hate change more than trolls.
>>>
>>>I don't filter them all, just the retards. The rest, I pan down the group
>>>before I read and mark as read any in whom I have no interest. Then I
>>>close,
>>>re-enter and bingo ... all gone)
>>
>> The only problem I have -if you can call it that- are the people who
>> use other people's names.
>
>I know. It is so damned boring working down the list to find they are doing
>that. It doesn't put me off reading those people though and it is usually
>easy to spot as soon as you open those posts.

Yes, it tends to be very obvious.

--
Bruce