On Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 11:37:03 AM UTC-4, Embudo wrote:
> On 10/8/2015 4:57 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 7:11:33 PM UTC-4, Embudo wrote:
> >> On 10/7/2015 5:08 PM, wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:03:34 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:52:54 -0300, wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
> >>>>> general want that if he became President he would ship all refugees
> >>>>> back where they came from.
> >>>>
> >>>> Those damned immgrants with their filthy metric system have to go!
> >>>
> >>> Lol is he against metric too ?
> >>
> >> The most coarse scale to measure human environmental temperatures with..
> >
> > Do you actually care if it's 70 or 72 F outside?
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
> >
>
>
> Do you think it sounds warmer at roughly 100 degreesF or 35C?

It doesn't matter how it sounds. I KNOW they're exactly the
same. "Feelings" are for little girls.

> Do you think the gradation between a 70 degree day and one in the 20s
> expresses with equal granularity that 30 degree temperature spread?

Yes, because of real numbers. 30, 30.5, 31, 31.5 (or as arbitrarily
fine gradations as your instrument will measure).

> Catch a clue.
>
> By imperious mathematical precision the metric system is a poor way to
> grade environmental temperature compared to farenheit - period.
>
> End of discussion.

Perhaps you should consider a domain besides the integers.

Cindy Hamilton