On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 21:22:13 -0400, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:36:50 -0700, "Cheri" >
>wrote:
>
>>
> wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 08:03:49 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:37:42 -0700 (PDT), Gregory Morrow
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://i60.tinypic.com/1z18w1x.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Nice!
>>>>
>>>>A nice waste of land.
>>>
>>> Yes, think how lovely it would be with wild flowers in the wind.
>>
>>I think it's lovely just the way it is.
>>
>>Cheri
>
>The moroons are just envious because they know nothing about land
>management... I maintain land for the benefit of wildlife... deer,
>geese, waterfowl, frogs, snakes, lizards, etc. Deer and geese need
>large tracts of lawn for food.

They need more than 'lawn' for proper nutrition.

>I have a large pond and a creek for
>maintaining wildlife, and plenty of forest for wildlife too... all
>balanced. Geese, mallards, storks, cranes, and other waterfowl need
>those large expanses for landing and take off, that's their airport.
>Those large mowed areas are very important for maintaining wildlife.

You have a rather strange approach to 'land management', if that's the
case.

>I
>maintain brush piles, paths through wooded areas, vernal ponds for
>waterfowl to raise their young, even areas for threatened plants.

That's more like it. Your lawn argument doesn't hold water though.

>Those jealous imbeciles don't have a clue about land management.

Indeed, that's why I have one of these signs on my front gate:
http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/ContentImag...W-logo_jpg.jpg

http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/conservatio...d-for-wildlife

Apart from around the house and other buildings, and my pastures, the
rest is natural bush and is staying that way.