Poor Kim sems to have commited an unforgivable sin by bringing up the
subject of Alminyum and Alzymers.

Although I am not competent to address the subject on scientific
grounds I think that it is not possible to eliminate culpability based
on other (non scientific) evidence.

Scientists are human and when I learned that a scientist took $18
Million from the Auminum industry to set up a proxy organization even
I started to accept that there could be a case.

For several years a principal source of funding for symposia and
research on AD in the USA was that organization. When some publicity
emerged a new proxy set-up took over with the same individual in the
top slot.

Did the Alzheimer's Association accept a computer system from the
Aluminum industry?? I have heard from one source (not verified) that
they did.

Papers are still emerging, based on large large scale studies, that
show a correlation of the incidence of dementia and aluminum in
drinking water.

It is starting to look as though gene expression of the most common
genetic defect predisposing people to AD also (?) confers an
incompetence in dealing with aluminum. I for one will start believing
in a link if the molecular biologists findings are repeated.

McDavitt