Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 08:25:33 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:26:09 -0500, James Silverton wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think the cocoa butter hypothesis is correct but I wouldn't buy any
>>>> bloomed chocolate.
>>>
>>> You can't see 99.5% of the chocolate in stores when you buy it.
>>
>> plenty of bulk chocolate candy is visible at my regular stupidmarket
>>
>> and then there's See's etc.
>
> It was inevitable that some dumbass would come along a protest about
> the other .5%. Tell you what - you go to the local major grocery
> store in your area and count the number of chocolate products you can
> see, and the number you can't see. Then get back to me.
>
> -sw

it's a lot more than .5 percent

someone needs a nap!