Another reason to criticize Walmart
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:09:10 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:
>
>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>> On 2015-02-10 12:32 PM, rosie wrote:
>>> On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:18:26 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham wrote: d Julie eats
>>>> about 20 of those a day and wonders why she's all ****ed up.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her
>>> alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Why do you feel a need to defend her? Is because she is obviously too
>> stupid to defend herself? There are reasons people keep dumping on her.
>> Aside from her constant lying, her whining about what she, her husband
>> and daughter can't, don't or won't eat, there is her MO of posting
>> messages looking for advice and then bashing every suggestion offered.
>
>Doesn't do me any good to even try to defend myself because no matter what I
>say, someone makes fun of it. There are no legitimate reasons for anyone to
>dump on anyone.
Poor parenting verging on child abuse is one good reason.
The endless outlandish and ridiculous scenarios that are unique to you
(and only you) is another reason.
Regular contradictions in regards to previous claims you make is
another.
>Unless of course you call mental illness or bullying, which
>I suppose is in some way a form of mental illness a legitimate reason. It
>would of course only be legitimate in the mind of the abuser.
Haha... you /choose/ to habitually post details about your family life
here, which is dysfunctional beyond belief and for which you seem to
be mostly responsible for. Either that, or all the stories are lies on
your part. Whichever scenario is the correct one makes you fair game
as far as many of us are concerned. The fact that you and *only* you
get this attention on this group is significant.
|