"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 1/17/2015 1:34 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:26:34 -0500, James Silverton wrote:
>>
>>> All the phones that are convenient in my house can display Caller ID. I
>>> have taken only to answering those that show an intelligible identity
>>> and not "unknown caller" etc., nor "wireless caller" nor a phone number.
>>>
>>> I also have an answering service and I wonder if I am making any
>>> unfortunate mistakes with my policy since any serious caller will leave
>>> a message including ID?
>>
>> If you're THIS lonely to be posting all this OT crap here, then you
>> should be answering ALL the calls that you get.
>>
>> of course you know you'll get dozens of replies about spam
>> telemarketing here, just like you did last time you instigated a
>> similar conversation.
>>
>> Nothing but a lonely troll.
>>
>> -sw
>>
> We *do* seem to go through this pointless discussion once a year at the
> very least.
>
> If they won't identify themselves or leave a message then it can't be
> terribly important. Seems pretty simple to me. Then again, I have no
> problem ignoring a ringing telephone.
>
> Jill

but maybe it's the club with a fantastic meal deal for you!